Kennedys logo

Search results

Search criteria
‘Bruce, John’
Brexit’s first casualty? Property investment funds: what you need to know

07 July 2016

The London Market will be keenly following the impact of Brexit. The suspension of redemptions from six property funds this week may signify the first casualty.

Insurance Brief – February 2014

5 March 2014

Welcome to this edition of Insurance Brief. Our feature article this month considers the Court of Appeal’s decision on wronged investors, the Financial Ombudsman Service and the courts.

No more double jeopardy

14 February 2014

Today the Court of Appeal has confirmed what right minded people thought was always the case. Wronged investors have a choice between pursuing a claim through the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) or pursuing it through the courts. They cannot choose both.

Insurance Brief - March 2013

25 March 2013

Welcome to this month's issue of Insurance Brief. In this edition, we report on a decision of the High Court concerning the ability of complainants to accept an award from the Financial Ombudsman Service and then pursue a claim for further damages in the courts and a recent case concerning whether the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers amounted to one or two events for reinsurance aggregation purposes, and we also consider the latest professional negligence decision relating to limitation.

Financial services complainants get two bites of the cherry

21 March 2013

High Court allows claim for additional damages to proceed against financial services provider despite acceptance of maximum award by Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

Mitigation costs - issues to consider

20 March 2013

The decision in Standard Life v Ace and others [2012] opened the way for insureds to argue that mitigation costs coverage could provide much broader cover than was ever anticipated by insurers.

Insurance Brief - January 2013

23 January 2013

Welcome to this month’s issue of Insurance Brief. In this edition, we report on two recent Court of Appeal decisions. The first concerned the principle of apportionment in a claim for mitigation costs under a professional indemnity policy, whilst the second reviewed the circumstances in which a solicitor might be held to be in breach of trust and whether they should be relieved from liability pursuant to s.61 of the Trustee Act 1925.

Mitigation costs cover reviewed

23 January 2013

Court of Appeal in England confirms no principle of apportionment of mitigation costs in liability insurance.

Page 1 of 3 (16 items found)